Well, that's some progress anyway! I remember seeing a demonstration of fusion in the General Electric pavilion at the '64-'65 Worlds Fair in Flushing, NY. We walked down a big spiral ramp and in the center, at the bottom was a big machine with a clear domed top. The fusion lasted much less than one second and there were a lot of flashes in this device. The guide explained that the fusion had occurred already and the flashes were automated cameras taking pictures of the chamber.DA74254 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 8:50 amBut yes, I agree with you, fusion woul'd be much much more favourable than fission. Since the last fusion tests I read about lasted about 8 seconds, I think there is still many years into the future before we will obtain a stable and reliable fusion technology.
WP43 News
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:46 pm
- Location: Malone, NY USA
Re: 43S News
Tom L
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Re: 43S News
Hmmh. In 1964, mankind knew about the fusion bomb for sure but I seriously doubt any company was able to "demonstrate" a controlled fusion reaction big enough for any camera to picture. Certainly, however, it was a nice demonstration suiting the spirit of that time and obviously impressive enough for you to remember after more than 50 years. And the guide was either very well trained or didn't know better ... (presumably the latter since nobody is as convincing as the ignorant).toml_12953 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:27 pmI remember seeing a demonstration of fusion in the General Electric pavilion at the '64-'65 Worlds Fair in Flushing, NY. We walked down a big spiral ramp and in the center, at the bottom was a big machine with a clear domed top. The fusion lasted much less than one second and there were a lot of flashes in this device. The guide explained that the fusion had occurred already and the flashes were automated cameras taking pictures of the chamber.
WP43 SN00000, 34S, and 31S for obvious reasons; HP-35, 45, ..., 35S, 15CE, DM16L S/N# 00093, DM42β SN:00041
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:46 pm
- Location: Malone, NY USA
Re: 43S News
It was very impressive. The cameras weren't taking pictures of the reaction, just the chamber after the fusion. GE didn't want a failure with all those onlookers! Actually, the most impressive thing for me was James Bond's Aston Martin DB5 that was on display at a monorail terminal. Also, we saw Kolonel (sic) Keds fly over the Unisphere wearing a Bell Rocketbelt. 10 year olds are easily impressed! Here's an article about it with an artist's conception of the device and the ramp.Walter wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 5:04 pmHmmh. In 1964, mankind knew about the fusion bomb for sure but I seriously doubt any company was able to "demonstrate" a controlled fusion reaction big enough for any camera to picture. Certainly, however, it was a nice demonstration suiting the spirit of that time and obviously impressive enough for you to remember after more than 50 years. And the guide was either very well trained or didn't know better ... (presumably the latter since nobody is as convincing as the ignorant).toml_12953 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 2:27 pmI remember seeing a demonstration of fusion in the General Electric pavilion at the '64-'65 Worlds Fair in Flushing, NY. We walked down a big spiral ramp and in the center, at the bottom was a big machine with a clear domed top. The fusion lasted much less than one second and there were a lot of flashes in this device. The guide explained that the fusion had occurred already and the flashes were automated cameras taking pictures of the chamber.
https://www.iter.org/newsline/-/1897
Tom L
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Re: 43S News
The chamber after the "fusion" looked like before, didn't it? Impressive! Worth a set of flashes Btw that's one important difference to the bomb... maybe even the crucial one...
Addendum: when we did our measurements for my master's degree end of the Seventies, we achieved some thousand fusions per second - fusions of oxygen with lead - no big deal, we did expect this rate. At the bottom line it depends which nuclei you fuse (you've to invest energy for fusing oxygen and lead while you gain energy when you fuse hydrogen and hydrogen, for instance). BEWARE: This is a very rudimentary sketch of this topic only!
Addendum: when we did our measurements for my master's degree end of the Seventies, we achieved some thousand fusions per second - fusions of oxygen with lead - no big deal, we did expect this rate. At the bottom line it depends which nuclei you fuse (you've to invest energy for fusing oxygen and lead while you gain energy when you fuse hydrogen and hydrogen, for instance). BEWARE: This is a very rudimentary sketch of this topic only!
WP43 SN00000, 34S, and 31S for obvious reasons; HP-35, 45, ..., 35S, 15CE, DM16L S/N# 00093, DM42β SN:00041
-
- Posts: 795
- Joined: Wed May 03, 2017 7:46 pm
- Location: Malone, NY USA
Re: 43S News
Here's a website that has an actual photo of the device.toml_12953 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 6:55 pm
It was very impressive. The cameras weren't taking pictures of the reaction, just the chamber after the fusion. GE didn't want a failure with all those onlookers! Actually, the most impressive thing for me was James Bond's Aston Martin DB5 that was on display at a monorail terminal. Also, we saw Kolonel (sic) Keds fly over the Unisphere wearing a Bell Rocketbelt. 10 year olds are easily impressed! Here's an article about it with an artist's conception of the device and the ramp.
https://www.iter.org/newsline/-/1897
https://www.westland.net/ny64fair/map-d ... ectric.htm
Tom L
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Some people call me inept but I'm as ept as anybody!
DM10L SN: 059/100
DM41X SN: 00023 (Beta)
DM41X SN: 00506 (Shipping)
DM42 SN: 00025 (Beta)
DM42 SN: 00221 (Shipping)
WP43 SN: 00025 (Prototype)
Re: 43S News
Thanks for sharing this link, nice read.toml_12953 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 25, 2020 10:50 pmHere's a website that has an actual photo of the device.
https://www.westland.net/ny64fair/map-d ... ectric.htm
(Emphasis added by me.)Inside the pavilion was the first demonstration of controlled thermonuclear fusion to be witnessed by a large general audience. A magnetic field squeezed a plasma of deuterium gas for a few millionths of a second at a temperature of 20 million degrees Fahrenheit. There was a vivid flash and a loud report as atoms collided, creating free energy (evidenced on nearby instruments).
Oh yes! Impressive! And certainly good marketing ...
WP43 SN00000, 34S, and 31S for obvious reasons; HP-35, 45, ..., 35S, 15CE, DM16L S/N# 00093, DM42β SN:00041
Re: 43S News
There are speculations in another thread about the fate of [d/c] formerly present g-shifted on the top left key: no, it didn't go into a menu. Instead [a b/c] will work as a toggle switching from decimal to proper fractions first, then turning to improper fractions, then proper fractions, and so on. Just for sake of clarity.
WP43 SN00000, 34S, and 31S for obvious reasons; HP-35, 45, ..., 35S, 15CE, DM16L S/N# 00093, DM42β SN:00041
Re: 43S News
Great. That makes sense. I like that. I saw in the code that it was a binary, eligible for a toggle instead of two labels.Walter wrote: ↑Tue Jan 28, 2020 8:25 amThere are speculations in another thread about the fate of [d/c] formerly present g-shifted on the top left key: no, it didn't go into a menu. Instead [a b/c] will work as a toggle switching from decimal to proper fractions first, then turning to improper fractions, then proper fractions, and so on. Just for sake of clarity.
Jaco Mostert
Elec Eng, South Africa
https://47calc.com C47 (s/n 03818 & 06199), WP43 (0015). In box: HP42S, HP32Sii, WP34S&C, HP28C, HP35s, EL-506P, EL-W506, PB700; ex: FX702P, 11C, HP67 & HP85; iOS: 42s Byron, Free42+, WP31S/34S, HCalc.
Elec Eng, South Africa
https://47calc.com C47 (s/n 03818 & 06199), WP43 (0015). In box: HP42S, HP32Sii, WP34S&C, HP28C, HP35s, EL-506P, EL-W506, PB700; ex: FX702P, 11C, HP67 & HP85; iOS: 42s Byron, Free42+, WP31S/34S, HCalc.
Re: 43S News
For those of you who are interested in: the updated draft manuals have been uploaded a few minutes ago.
As usual, comments, remarks, critics, pointers to errors and typos, questions, etc. are welcome and will be answered asap.
As usual, comments, remarks, critics, pointers to errors and typos, questions, etc. are welcome and will be answered asap.
WP43 SN00000, 34S, and 31S for obvious reasons; HP-35, 45, ..., 35S, 15CE, DM16L S/N# 00093, DM42β SN:00041
Re: 43S News
Walter - The latest manuals I see in gitlab are version 0_14, though update time of "8 hours ago" confirm they are fresh. Isn't the version number typically incremented each release?
--bob p
DM42: β00071 & 00282, DM41X: β00071 & 00656, DM10L: 071/100
DM42: β00071 & 00282, DM41X: β00071 & 00656, DM10L: 071/100