SwissMicros Calculator Forum

Works now !

Well, I've re-flashed my DM42 to the previous firmware version, and will wait until a reliable new version is available with a dynamic stack. Fortunately, I saved the previous binary file on my computer.

Just downloaded and installed the supposedly patched combo binary file, but the problem persists. -1 SQRT yields Insufficient Memory error, so, either the DM42 program has not been patched or the patch doesn't work. The former. Note that there hasn't been any announcement yet from SM since my fix ....

Just downloaded and installed the supposedly patched combo binary file, but the problem persists. -1 SQRT yields Insufficient Memory error, so, either the DM42 program has not been patched or the patch doesn't work.

It is in the works, honest! While you are working on implementing the Big Stack feature in Free42 3.0.x, might I suggest that you add the capability to display the LAST x register along with the stack registers, as is the case with the standard 4-level stack mode. The stack registers would be label...

I think that Free42 should now be renamed Free42s, where the "s" suffix stands for "supercharged."

The dynamic stack feature is great for the Free42 emulator, but it is even better on the DM42 with its multi-line display. This is why I urge the SM crew to update the DM42 with the new version 3 of Free42, even it there are no current updates for the DMCP OS or other DM42 features and bug fixes. I...

The dynamic stack feature is great for the Free42 emulator, but it is even better on the DM42 with its multi-line display. This is why I urge the SM crew to update the DM42 with the new version 3 of Free42, even it there are no current updates for the DMCP OS or other DM42 features and bug fixes.

Thanks ! Apparently, it can also be configured to emulate the HP 49g+, but I chose to keep it as the HP 48GX. My physical calculator is an HP 48SX.

Thomas Okken wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 31, 2021 10:44 pm

This is what it looks like in Firefox on my Mac:

Screen Shot 2021-01-31 at 4.42.42 PM.png

Yeah, that's much better than on my 25" FHD monitor in Chrome. I also made the same mistake and at first thought you had 1/3 instead of sqrt(3).